Crypto Ad Bans: Internet Giants Take Action - So what?
Crypto Ad Bans
Following Facebook’s announcement
in January that it would ban all adverts for cryptocurrencies and ICOs and
Google’s decision to impose similar restrictions in March, Twitter has reacted
by claiming last Monday that it would do the same.
A Twitter spokesperson declared
that “under this new policy, the advertisement of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
and token sales will be prohibited globally.” The company’s main goal is to
ensure the safety of its community by protecting consumers from online scams.
What is the actual purpose of implementing these regulations?
Firstly, it proves once again that
big tech companies are increasingly influential – maybe too much – as to how
financial services products are advertised as regulators themselves have not
been able to agree on a decisive solution on the matter. Indeed, just a few
weeks ago, the G20 failed to agree on specific regulatory actions.
It therefore seems that the
companies have unilaterally decided to take the matter in their own hands.
However, it is interesting to see that these announcements are happening at a
time in which they are increasingly under pressure because of their “losecontrol of data privacy” (Arnaud Masset, cryptocurrency analyst at Swissquote
Bank) Moreover, is it a coincidence that Zuckerberg also recently announced
that Facebook was looking into cryptocurrency? The main motivations behind the
policies are therefore debatable.
What are the consequences?
These ad bans have not had
significant consequences on the prices of cryptocurrencies. For instance, after
the companies’ announcements, the price of Bitcoin dropped but recovered pretty
quickly – in only a few hours after the Facebook news.
According to Austin Kimm, industry
expert and IR Director and Co-founder of one of the leading digital
crypto-banks, these ad bans might have a positive effect as they will “allow
the most substantiated cryptocurrencies to rise to the top rather than be
buried under hundreds of others throwing money in advertising.”
It is not likely that these
regulations will have a long-term impact on the prices of cryptocurrencies, but
they should nonetheless be taken into consideration. One of the downsides of
the regulation would be if Google and other tech companies failed to
acknowledge the difference between an ICO selling token and the utility nature
of a token. If this were to happen, the companies could end up banning all token
ads, although those are often used in video games. The gaming industry using
tokens would therefore be extremely hurt.
So what are the companies trying to do?
Companies are either trying to
restrain the bad actors and promote the good ones or they are trying to protect
their own interests and relieve the pressure put on them by regulators. One
thing that we know for sure is that these internet giants are not against the
idea of cryptocurrencies as Twitter’s CEO believes that eventually the bitcoin will
become the internet’s single global currency within 10 years and Facebook is
thinking about launching its own cryptocurrency!
Comments
Post a Comment